← Back to Threshold Network
Threshold Network · closed proposal

TIP-064: Sunsetting explicit tBTC coverage pool contracts

0x8FBC…9A71·ended 2y ago·Discussion ↗·MEDIUM RISK
Voters
8
T voted
788.26M
Token price

AI summary

This proposal suggests discontinuing the current dedicated 'coverage pool' smart contracts for tBTC, which are designed to act as insurance against Bitcoin collateral losses. Instead, it proposes moving to an 'implicit coverage pool' model where the entire Threshold DAO treasury, consisting of various assets like T, ETH, wBTC, and stablecoins, would serve as the backstop. The DAO's treasury assets are currently held across several multisig wallets and a timelock controller.

Impact

If passed, the explicit coverage pool contracts will be retired. The DAO's treasury assets will be used more flexibly, potentially earning yield in DeFi strategies, but will also bear the direct responsibility for covering any tBTC collateral losses. This could benefit the DAO by optimizing asset utilization, but it centralizes the risk management to the Treasury Guild and the overall DAO treasury.

Read full proposal on Snapshot

Voting results

Approve786.63M (99.8%)
Disapprove1.62M (0.2%)
788.26M T · 8 votersblock 18621562

🐳 Whale votes

0 votes > 5% VP
No whale votes on this proposal.

Full proposal

Original markdown · Threshold Network

Threshold’s coverage pool contracts are designed to provide an insurance backstop against potential losses in the Bitcoin collateral backing tBTC. However, it’s clear that T-only coverage pools are a sub-optimal solution given the inherent relationship between tBTC and T. In case of a BTC collateral loss event, it’s likely that T would experience a significant price impact, reducing it’s effectiveness as an insurance backstop.

Far better are coverage pools with exogenous assets that are not correlated with tBTC (i.e. ETH, ETH LSTs, BTC).

However, naively deploying coverage pools with exogeno…

📚 Similar past proposals

Finding similar proposals…