Should the DAO Create COI & Self Voting Policies?
AI summary
This proposal is a temperature check for the Arbitrum DAO to decide if it should create official policies regarding conflicts of interest (COI) and self-voting. It aims to restart a discussion on these topics, which are common in traditional corporate governance but less formalized in DAOs. The proposal outlines various approaches, from maintaining the current state to implementing strict self-voting rules, drawing comparisons to policies in other DAOs like Uniswap, Maker, and Optimism.
If this proposal passes, it will signal the DAO's interest in developing formal COI and self-voting policies, potentially leading to a more professionalized and transparent governance structure. This could benefit the DAO by increasing trust and accountability, but it's too early to determine who specifically benefits or loses as the policies themselves are not yet defined.
Voting results
🐳 Whale votes
0 votes > 5% VPFull proposal
This is a temperature check to gauge the DAO's overall opinion on creating official conflict of interest and self-voting policies. No social contract, guidelines, or policy will be adopted directly from the result of this vote.
Please find the full proposal on the forums, certain sections such as Enforcement and Timeline have been removed to adhere to character limits: https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/should-the-dao-create-coi-self-voting-policies/26062
Abstract
This proposal aims to restart the conversation around the creation of self-voting and conflict of interests policies. The p…