← Back to StarkNetRead full proposal on Snapshot ↗
StarkNet · closed proposal
What privacy features are missing on Starknet that would make you more active?
0xdBdF…e4b0·ended 11mo ago·● LOW RISK
🐳 Whale activity
Voters
1,160
STRK voted
389.31M
≈$12.09M
Token price
$0.03
AI summary
This StarkNet proposal is a poll asking community members to identify which privacy features, if implemented, would encourage them to use the platform more frequently. The options provided are confidential transfers, anonymous accounts, and confidential DeFi.
Impact
If this proposal passes, it will signal to StarkNet developers which privacy features are most desired by the community, potentially influencing future development priorities. There are no direct financial implications or immediate changes to the protocol.
Voting results
Confidential transfers122.14M (31.4%)
Anonymous accounts211.94M (54.4%)
Confidential DeFi55.23M (14.2%)
389.31M STRK · ≈$12.09M · 1160 votersblock 23424320
Votes over time
x-axis = % of voting window elapsed · y-axis = cumulative VP per choice
🐳 Whale votes
5 votes > 5% VP0x06ed…da21
11mo ago · voted Confidential transfers
9.7%
37.85M VP
≈$1.18M
0x00bf…9899
11mo ago · voted Anonymous accounts
9.7%
37.80M VP
≈$1.17M
0x07a5…9259
11mo ago · voted Anonymous accounts
9.7%
37.80M VP
≈$1.17M
0x0050…bdcb
11mo ago · voted Anonymous accounts
9.7%
37.80M VP
≈$1.17M
0x011c…e92e
11mo ago · voted Confidential transfers
9.7%
37.80M VP
≈$1.17M
Full proposal
Original markdown · StarkNet
This question asks which missing privacy tools would drive your usage:
- Confidential transfers – Send tokens privately without revealing amounts or addresses.
- Anonymous accounts – Create accounts that hide ownership, unlinking identity from activity.
- Confidential DeFi – Use lending, trading, or yield protocols without revealing positions or strategies.
📚 Similar past proposals
Finding similar proposals…